Thank you for providing such a comprehensive and insightful answer. At the outset of the conversation, I believed I could enumerate every element that contributed to the final outcome; nevertheless, individuals often get inundated with excessive inconsequential information. I am willing to provide the background for anybody interested. The automobile was acquired via an internet auction by a friend's girlfriend. She said that the winning offer was $1500; however, the agreement stipulates that the seller is responsible for transporting the car to the buyer. The cost amounted to $1500, resulting in a total expenditure of $3000, and she had yet to hear it operate. Upon arrival, the driver had the title but withheld it until she signed a document affirming that she would forgo any legal action against the auction business in the event of issues with the car. I was astonished that she had progressed this far, but she believed she would forfeit the $3000 she had invested, along with a further $1500 that the driver said would be charged for the return. This summarizes the chaotic situation succinctly. Upon removing the valve covers, plugs, and injectors, I tried to inspect the cylinders using a camera via the spark plug aperture; however, the orifice was too little to facilitate access. I examined the valves via the intake passageways and saw no apparent issues. I suggested that we observe the lifters via the cameras to identify any anomalies. We did not, and she was informed of the probability that the damage was more extensive than only the guides and tensioners. Given the expenses for the components, equipment, and the car, together with the few hundred dollars she had already provided, she was reluctant to remove the heads, as this would significantly elevate the costs. I believe it would not have incurred any further costs compared to the current expenses, other from the labor charges she will need to cover. I believe it is time to convey the unfortunate news to her.